Law. Human. Environment

Balancing public safety and civil rights: Successes and challenges of AI-based video surveillance systems

Surya Sagar Vaddiparti, Fuad Babaiev
Download article
Abstract

In contemporary society, security has acquired exceptional importance, prompting increasing interest in intelligent video surveillance. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic analysis of current approaches to AI-powered video analytics, encompassing technological algorithms, legal constraints, and the social implications of their application. The methodology employed an interdisciplinary approach combining systems analysis, legal and comparative methods, analytical review, and case study analysis. The research examined the functional capabilities of intelligent video systems based on machine learning and deep learning. It revealed that although modern AI video analytics systems are highly effective in enhancing security (e.g., threat detection and behavioural analysis), they also generate significant ethical and legal risks – particularly with respect to privacy violations and algorithmic discrimination. A comparative legal analysis highlighted marked differences in regulatory models across jurisdictions: European systems emphasise privacy protection, while the Chinese approach prioritises threat prevention. AI-powered video analytics has had a profound impact on the right to privacy, particularly due to the mass collection of biometric data and automated profiling, sparking debate over compliance with international standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights. The comparative analysis demonstrated divergent approaches: in the EU, privacy protection is paramount (e.g., the ban on facial recognition in France), whereas China and the United States focus more on security – often at the expense of civil liberties. Regulatory challenges include the misalignment of national laws with international norms, especially regarding data retention and algorithmic bias. To strike a balance, the study proposed clear legal frameworks, limitations on data storage periods, independent oversight, and “ethical passports” for algorithms – measures that would combine technological efficacy with the safeguarding of human rights. The study recommends harmonising standards that take into account both technical capacities and ethical-legal norms. The practical value lies in the potential use of the findings to design balanced AI video analytics systems

Keywords

surveillance; legal frameworks; algorithmic bias; privacy policy; crime prevention; public safety

Suggested citation
Vaddiparti, S.S., & Babaiev, F. (2025). Balancing public safety and civil rights: Successes and challenges of AI-based video surveillance systems. Law. Human. Environment, 16(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/2.2025.118
References

[1] Ahmed, I., & Jeon, G. (2021). A real-time person tracking system based on SiamMask network for intelligent video surveillance. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 18(5), 1803-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11554-021-01144-5.

[2] Almeida, D., Shmarko, K., & Lomas, E. (2022). The ethics of facial recognition technologies, surveillance, and accountability in an age of artificial intelligence: A comparative analysis of US, EU, and UK regulatory frameworks. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 377-387. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00077-w.

[3] Ameen, M., & Stone, R. (2023). Advancements in crowd-monitoring system: A comprehensive analysis of systematic approaches and automation algorithms: State-of-the-art. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.03907.

[4] Anderljung, M., et al. (2023). Frontier AI regulation: Managing emerging risks to public safety. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.03718.

[5] Andrew, J., & Baker, M. (2021). The general data protection regulation in the age of surveillance capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 565-578. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04239-z.

[6] Antunes, M.E. (2019). Surveillance and predictive policing through AI. Retrieved from https:// www.deloitte.com/an/en/Industries/government-public/perspectives/urban-future-with-a-purpose/surveillance-and-predictive-policing-through-ai.html?utm.

[7] Ardabili, B.R., Pazho, A.D., Noghre, G.A., Neff, C., Bhaskararayuni, S.D., Ravindran, A., Reid, S., & Tabkhi, H. (2023). Understanding policy and technical aspects of ai-enabled smart video surveillance to address public safety. Computational Urban Science, 3(1), article number 21. doi: 10.1007/s43762-023-00097-8.

[8] Atkinson, K., Collenette, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Dsehtsiarou, K. (2021). Practical tools from formal models: The ECHR as a case study. In J. Maranhão & A.Z. Wyner (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (pp. 170-174). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3462757.3466095.

[9] Baek, D.S. (2024). Skynet project in China – the rise of ubiquitous surveillance. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@davidsehyeonbaek/skynet-project-in-china-the-rise-of-ubiquitous-surveillance-33fee53c350e.

[10] Cabanillas-Carbonell, M., Rivera, J.S., & Muñoz, J.S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in video surveillance systems for suspicious activity detection and incident response: A systematic literature. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 19(3), 389-405. doi: 10.12913/22998624/196795.

[11] California Consumer Privacy Act. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa.

[12] Çelikkaya, D. (2024). Ethical concerns of artificial intelligence use in the criminal justice system under EU law. Istanbul: Marmara Universitesi.

[13] CLOUD Act Resources. (2019, April). Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/criminal/cloud-act-resources.

[14] Constitution of the United States. (1787, September). Retrieved from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/.

[15] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950, November). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/european-convention-on-human-rights.

[16] Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., de Prado, M.L., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023). Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Information Fusion, 99, article number 101896. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896.

[17] Doboș, S., & Bagrin, V. (2024). The balance between privacy and safety: The ethics of public video surveillance. In Technical-scientific conference of students, master and PhD students (pp. 805-809). Chisinau: Tehnica-UTM.

[18] El-Alfy, E.-S., Bebis, G., & Zhou, M. (2023). Intelligent image and video analytics. London: CRC Press.

[19] Fontes, C., Hohma, E., Corrigan, C.C., & Lütge, C. (2022). AI-powered public surveillance systems: why we (might) need them and how we want them. Technology in Society, 71, article number 102137. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102137.

[20] General Data Protection Regulation. (2016, May). Retrieved from https://gdpr-info.eu.

[21] Habbal, A., Ali, M.K., & Abuzaraida, M.A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence trust, risk and security management (AI trism): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 240, article number 122442. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122442.

[22] Hysen, E. (2024). AI at DHS: A deep dive into our use case inventory. Retrieved from https://www. dhs.gov/archive/news/2024/12/16/ai-dhs-deep-dive-our-use-case-inventory?utm.

[23] Kaminski, M.E., Snow, J., Wu, F.T., & Hughes, J. (2021). Symposium: The California consumer privacy act. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3763290.

[24] Karishma, V.R., & Vigneswaran, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in video surveillance. In

P. Swarnalatha (Ed.), Handbook of research on deep learning techniques for cloud-based industrial IoT (pp. 1-17). London: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8098-4.ch001.

[25] Kashef, M., Visvizi, A., & Troisi, O. (2021). Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, article number 106923. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106923.

[26] Kosinski, M. (2021). Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation from naturalistic facial images. Scientific Reports, 11(1), article number 100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79310-1.

[27] Mantelero, A. (2022). Beyond data: Human rights, ethical and social impact assessment in AI. Berlin: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-531-7.

[28] Nishat, K. (2024). Human rights protections in digital surveillance: Balancing security needs and privacy rights. Mayo Communication Journal, 1(1), 83-92.

[29] Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. (2021, August). Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-08/20/content_5632486.htm.

[30] Poirson, C. (2021). The legal regulation of facial recognition. In K. Miller & K. Wendt (Eds.), The fourth industrial revolution and its impact on ethics: Solving the challenges of the agenda 2030 (pp. 283-302). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57020-0_21.

[31] Privacy Act. (1974, December). Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opcl/privacy-act-1974.

[32] Rashid, A.B., & Kausik, A.K. (2024). AI revolutionising industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 7, article number 100277. doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277.

[33] Ricciardi Celsi, L. (2023). The dilemma of rapid AI advancements: Striking a balance between innovation and regulation by pursuing risk-aware value creation. Information, 14(12), article number 645. doi: 10.3390/info14120645.

[34] Şengönül, E., Samet, R., Abu Al-Haija, Q., Alqahtani, A., Alturki, B., & Alsulami, A.A. (2023). An analysis of artificial intelligence techniques in surveillance video anomaly detection: A comprehensive survey. Applied Sciences, 13(8), article number 4956. doi: 10.3390/app13084956.

[35] Smith, M., & Miller, S. (2022). The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology.

AI & Society, 37(1), 167-175. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01199-9.

[36] Sugianto, N. (2021). Responsible AI for automated analysis of integrated video surveillance in public spaces. Gold Coast: Griffith University. doi: 10.25904/1912/4371.

[37] Sugianto, N., Tjondronegoro, D., Stockdale, R., & Yuwono, E.I. (2024). Privacy-preserving AI- enabled video surveillance for social distancing: Responsible design and deployment for public spaces. Information Technology & People, 37(2), 998-1022. doi: 10.1108/ITP-07-2020-0534.

[38] Sujkowski, M., Kozuba, J., Uchroński, P., Banaś, A., Pulit, P., & Gryżewska, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence systems for supporting video surveillance operators at international airport. Transportation Research Procedia, 74, 1284-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.273.

[39] Sung, C.S., & Park, J.Y. (2021). Design of an intelligent video surveillance system for crime prevention: applying deep learning technology. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(26), 34297-34309. doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-10809-z.

[40] Team DigitalDefynd. (2025). AI in public safety – 5 case studies [2025]. Retrieved from https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/ai-in-public-safety/.

[41] Tóth, L. (2023). The evolution of public surveillance systems in Europe. Magyar Rendésset, 23(1), 191-204. doi: 10.32577/mr.2023.1.12.

[42] Ullah, W., Ullah, A., Hussain, T., Muhammad, K., Heidari, A.A., Del Ser, J., Baik, S.W., & De Albuquerque, V.H. (2022). Artificial Intelligence of Things-assisted two-stream neural network for anomaly detection in surveillance Big Video Data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 286-297. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.10.033.

[43] Valentino, S. (2025). CHP uses AI surveillance to arrest Bay Area suspect on Oakland bus. Retrieved from https://is.gd/yfvzoO.