This study examined the legal protection afforded to holders of written evidence of former customary land ownership in Indonesia, particularly in the context of Article 96(2) of Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 “On the Management Rights, Land Rights, and Land Registration”, which renders such documents invalid after five years. The provision raises significant concerns regarding legal certainty and the constitutional rights of Indigenous communities. Employing a normative juridical method and a conceptual approach, the study analysed the tension between state-imposed administrative requirements and the historically rooted recognition of land ownership under customary law. The findings indicated that the sudden invalidation of traditional land documents without transitional mechanisms creates legal exclusion and deepens structural inequality, particularly among rural and Indigenous populations with limited access to legal resources. The analysis demonstrated that such a policy undermines the principles of procedural fairness, legitimate expectations, and the protection of property rights as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia and international human rights instruments. The study argued for a rights-based and restorative framework to ensure transitional legal protection and the recognition of non-formal evidence rooted in Indigenous traditions. This approach is essential for aligning agrarian policy with justice, inclusivity, and constitutional obligations
customary land rights; legal certainty; Indigenous communities; transitional justice; land registration; property rights; constitutional protection
[1] Abdullah, A., Fisher, M.R., & Sahide, M.A.K. (2024). Environmental governance challenges of Indigenous forest recognition: Climate solution ideal and its uneven outcomes in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 8(2), 402-421. doi: 10.24259/fs.v8i2.34423.
[2] Aprido, R., & Fatimah, F. (2023). The Resolution of customary community land rights issues based on Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 and its relevance to the Constitution in Indonesia. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), article number 893. doi: 10.29210/1202323279.
[3] Artaji, Sulistiani, L., Rajamanicam, & Fakhriah, E.A. (2024). Resolution of agrarian conflicts on plantation land through restorative justice in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 107-136. doi: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14060.
[4] Aznannya, S.H. (2024). Beyond formality: Transforming FPIC into a tool for indigenous empowerment. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 2(4), 325-337. doi: 10.61194/law.v2i4.724.
[5] Bose, P. (2023). Equitable land-use policy? Indigenous peoplesʼ resistance to mining-induced deforestation. Land Use Policy, 129, article number 106648. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106648.
[6] Constitution of Indonesia. (1945, April). Retrieved from https://surl.li/qqnxns.
[7] Constitutional Act of Canada. (1982, April). Retrieved from https://surli.cc/whifzg.
[8] Decree of the President of Mexico to Reform Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution. (1992, January). Retrieved from https://surl.li/enszzg.
[9] Dudgeon, P., & Bray, A. (2019). Indigenous relationality: Women, kinship and the law. Genealogy, 3(2), article number 23. doi: 10.3390/genealogy3020023.
[10] Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 18 of 2021 “On the Management Rights, Land Rights, and Land Registration”. (2021, February). Accessed from https://surl.li/etkgpj.
[11] Hamida, N.A. (2022). Adat law and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 3(1). doi: 10.19184/ijls.v3i1.26752.
[12] Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention. (1989, June). Retrieved from https://surl.li/ngpxwp.
[13] Isra, S., & Tegnan, H. (2021). Legal syncretism or the theory of unity in diversity as an alternative to legal pluralism in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(6), 553- 568. doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-04-2018-0082.
[14] Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Case “Delgamuukw v. British Columbia”. (1997, December). Retrieved from https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1569/index.do.
[15] Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Case “Tsilhqotʼin Nation v. British Columbia”. (2014, June). Retrieved from https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14246/index.do.
[16] Kamula, A.A. (2025). Implications of the non-involvement of the Cek Bocek Selesek Reen Sury indigenous community in the mining business approval process in Sumbawa Regency. Peradaban Hukum Nusantara, 1(2), 30-49. doi: 10.62193/4yffpb85.
[17] Law of Indonesia No. 24 “On Land Registration”. (1997, July). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/56273/pp-no-24-tahun-1997.
[18] Law of Indonesia No. 5 “Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles”. (1960, August). Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ins3920.pdf.
[19] Lukito, R. (2013). Legal pluralism in Indonesia: Bridging the unbridgeable. Singapure: Routledge.
[20] Marshall, V. (2019). Removing the veil from the “rights of nature”: The dichotomy between first nations customary rights and environmental legal personhood. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 45(2), 233-248. doi: 10.1080/13200968.2019.1802154.
[21] McCarthy, J.F., Dhiaulhaq, A., Suraya, A., & Robinson, K. (2022). Land reform rationalities and their governance effects in Indonesia: Provoking land politics or addressing adverse formalisation? Geoforum, 132, 92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.04.008.
[22] Native Title Act of Australia. (1993, December). Retrieved from https://surli.cc/lqjbdy.
[23] Nehaluddin, A. (2020). Human right to water under international law regime: An overview. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 46(3), 415-439. doi: 10.1080/03050718.2020.1770618.
[24] Notess, L., Veit, P., Monterroso, I., Sulle, E., Larson, A.M., Gindroz, A.-S., Quaedvlieg, J., & Williams, A. (2021). Community land formalisation and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries. Land Use Policy, 110, article number 104461. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104461.
[25] OʼSullivan, D., Came, H., McCreanor, T., & Kidd, J. (2021). A critical review of the cabinet circular on Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Treaty of Waitangi advice to ministers. Ethnicities 21(6), 1093-1112. doi: 10.1177/14687968211047902.
[26] Profor. (2024). Benefit sharing and customary land rights in forest areas for Indonesian indigenous peoples. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jijqhv.
[27] Rahmat, A., Pujirahayu, E.W., & Syamsudin, M. (2023). The existence of Nagari in West Sumatra on state policy hegemony. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(2), 310-329. doi: 10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.45.
[28] Sani, H.B.A. (2020). State law and legal pluralism: Towards an appraisal. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 52(1), 82-109. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1727726.
[29] Sihotang, A.P., Izziyana, W.V., & Wirawan, P. (2025). Legal protection of indigenous peoples and traditional communities in Indonesia from the perspective of the social environment. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on social environment diversity (pp. 686-692). Weilengbuurt: Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-366-5_68.
[30] Simarmata, R. (2019). The enforceability of formalised customary land rights in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 19(2), 299-313.
[31] Specific Claims Tribunal Act. (2008, June). Retrieved from https://surl.li/pkrhqa.
[32] Stauffer, J. (2020). Law and oral history: Hearing the claims of indigenous peoples. New York: Routledge.
[33] Tamanaha, B.Z. (2021). Legal pluralism explained: History, theory, consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[34] Teitelbaum, S., Asselin, H., Bissonnette, J.-F., & Blouin, D. (2023). Governance in the boreal forest: What role for local and indigenous communities? Boreal Forests in the Face of Climate Change, 74, 513-532.
[35] Treaty of Waitangi. (1840). Retrieved from https://surl.li/svqpaa.
[36] Vásquez, A.L. (2024). Indigenous peoples, commons and the challenge of sustaining life amid capitalist land grabs. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 52(6), 1107-1134. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2024.2431517.
[37] Veriasa, T.O., Maulana, S.J., & Hariyadi, S. (Eds.). (2020). Social forestry, hope for preserving shared resources: A collection of studies and lessons learned in Indonesia. Kota Bogor: IPB Press.
[38] Ward, A., Wily, A.L., Cotula, L., & Taylor, M. (2012). Land rights and the rush for land: Findings of the global commercial pressures on land research project. Rome: ILC.
[39] Wijaya, I., Ketut Kasta Arya, I., Suwitra, M., Senastri, N.M.J., Nazarrudin, T., & Sulaiman. (2024). Patterns of indigenous land tenure and utilisation: Comparison of customary law in Balinese and Acehnese people. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 22(3), 41-49. doi: 10.9734/ arjass/2024/v22i3521.
[40] Wily, L.A. (2009). Tackling land tenure in the emergency to development transition in post-conflict states: From restitution to reform. doi: 10.3362/9781780440408.003.
[41] Zamrud, W.O., & Salam, S. (2022). Human right and indigenous peoples: Transitional justice approach. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 9(4), 98-109. doi: 10.32628/IJSRST229411.