This study aimed to examine international legal standards and the practices of international judicial bodies in the field of environmental protection. To achieve this aim, methods of structural, comparative- legal, and hermeneutic analysis were applied. It was established that the majority of international legal instruments, such as conventions and recommendations, rely on voluntary compliance, which significantly limits their practical effectiveness. Nation states retain the right to determine independently the means of fulfilling their international obligations, particularly in cases where such obligations may conflict with national sovereignty. However, international judicial institutions dealing with interstate disputes often demonstrate limited effectiveness in ensuring the protection of individual environmental rights, due to protracted proceedings and the limited impact of their decisions. It was noted that during wartime and in post-conflict recovery, financial and human resources are typically redirected towards rebuilding infrastructure and providing humanitarian assistance, which may reduce attention to the implementation of international environmental standards. Without adapting general norms to specific conditions, their implementation may prove ineffective or even counterproductive, thereby diminishing their practical utility in environmental protection. Emphasis was placed on the importance of establishing an environmental court in Ukraine as a means of strengthening environmental justice. The experience of the United States of America in environmental regulation has demonstrated the importance of establishing an effective hierarchical system of state bodies that ensures a balance between federal and local levels, alongside the introduction of mechanisms for public oversight. It has been established that drawing on international experience, integrating international standards, and implementing effective monitoring systems are critically important for enhancing environmental security and promoting sustainable development in Ukraine
martial law; legal regulation; environmental rights; European Court of Human Rights; International Court of Justice
[1] Alternative fuels. (2010). EPA. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/alternative-fuels.
[2] Angstadt, J.M. (2023). Can domestic environmental courts implement international environmental law? A framework for institutional analysis. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(2), 318-342. doi: 10.1017/S2047102523000092.
[3] Angstadt, J.M., & Schink, M.S. (2023). Specialist environmental courts and tribunals: A systematic literature review and case for earth system governance analysis. Earth System Governance, 18, article number 100192. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2023.100192.
[4] Aqimuddin, E., & Latipulhayat, A. (2023). Legality and legitimacy of domestic court decision as a source of international law-making. Brazilian Journal of International Law, 20(1), 129-140. doi: 10.5102/rdi.v20i1.9080.
[5] Arjjumend, H. (2024). Introduction to advances in environmental law. In H. Arjjumend (Ed.), Advances in environmental law (pp. 1-20). Montreal, Vancouver: TGI Books/The Grassroots Institute. doi: 10.33002/enrlaw-333/c1.
[6] Banda, M.L. (2020). Climate science in the courts: A review of U.S. and International judicial pronouncements. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.
[7] Bibia, C., Tabassum, S., & Roussel, Y. (2024). International environmental law: Challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation. Journal of Energy & Environmental Policy Options, 7(2), 28-35.
[8] Bodansky, D. (2020). The role and limits of the International Court of Justice in international environmental law. SRRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=3606268.
[9] Castner, J. (2020). Ozone alerts and respiratory emergencies: The environmental protection agencyʼs potential biological pathways for respiratory effects. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 46(4), 413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.05.008.
[10] Central Asia: Water and conflict. (2002). Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/uzbekistan/central-asia-water-and-conflict.
[11] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80.
[12] Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). (2005, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_015#Text.
[13] Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols). (1997, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text.
[14] Corcaci, A. (2023). Implementing decisions on environmental conflicts beyond the nation state. A concept structural outline. Nordic Journal of European Law, 6(4), 98-132. doi: 10.36969/njel.v6i4.25921.
[15] EcoZagroza. (2024). Retrieved from https://ecozagroza.gov.ua/.
[16] Etty, T., Heyvaert, V., Carlarne, C., Huber, B., Peel, J., & van Zeben, J. (2021). Ten years on: Rethinking transnational environmental law. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(3), 391-400. doi: 10.1017/S2047102521000303.
[17] Faishal, A., & Suprapto. (2022). Laws and regulations regarding food waste management as a function of environmental protection in a developing nation. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 17(2), 223-237.
[18] Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc. (1999, October). Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/98-822.
[19] Hemmerling, S.A., DeMyers, C.A., & Carruthers, T.J.B. (2022). Building resilience through collaborative management of coastal protection and restoration planning in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, USA. Sustainability, 14(5), article number 2974. doi: 10.3390/su14052974.
[20] Heri, C. (2022). Climate change before the European Court of Human Rights: Capturing risk, ill- treatment and vulnerability. European Journal of International, 33(3), 925-951. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chac047.
[21] Hrushko, M. (2023). International legal protection of the natural environment and the issue of responsibility for causing damage to the environment in connection with the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Academic Visions, 22, 1-10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10071974.
[22] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case “Hutton and Others v. the United Kingdom”. (2003, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_105#Text.
[23] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case No. 116/1996/735/932 “Guerra and Others v. Italy”. (1998, February). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58135%22]}.
[24] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case No. 30499/03 “Dubetska and Others v. Ukraine”. (2011, October). Retrieved from https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/SOO00205.
[25] Judgment European Court of Human Rights in the Case No. 38182/03 “Hrymkovska v. Ukraine”. (2011, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_729#Text.
[26] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case No. 42488/02 “Dzemiuk v. Ukraine”. (2014, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_a51#Text.
[27] Judgmeunt of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 79-639 “United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians”. (1980, March). Retrieved from https://surl.lu/rvvuub.
[28] Judgmeunt of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Case “Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency”. (2006, June). Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/05-1120.
[29] Keller, H., & Heri, C. (2022). The future is now: Climate cases before the ECtHR. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 40(1), 153-174. doi: 10.1080/18918131.2022.2064074.
[30] Kourouni, M. (2024). The interplay between international environmental law and the global reach of EU law. De Jure Journal, 17(1), 77-83.
[31] Kuzmenko, (2024). The UN International Court of Justice will decide whether Ukraineʼs genocide lawsuit against Russia is admissible. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/672376-miznarodnij-sud-oon-skaze-ci-prijnatnij-pozov-ukraini-proti-rf-u-spravi-genocidu/.
[32] Kwakwa, V. (2024). Celebrating water day: Why access to clean water is vital for Africa. World Bank Blocks. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/africacan/celebrating-water-day--why-access-to-clean-water-is-vital-for-af.
[33] Kyriakopoulos, G.L. (2021). Environmental legislation in European and international contexts: Legal practices and social planning toward the circular economy. Laws, 10(1), article number 3. doi: 10.3390/laws10010003.
[34] Law of Ukraine No. 3477-IV “On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights”. (2006, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text.
[35] Law, K.L., Starr, N., Siegler, T.R., Jambeck, J.R., Mallos, N.J., & Leonard, G.N. (2020). The United Statesʼ contribution of plastic waste to land and ocean. Science Advances, 6, article number eabd0288. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0288.
[36] Lazarus, R.J. (2023). The making of environmental law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[37] Levenets, А. (2022). The role of the ECTHR in the system of international control for the fulfillment of state obligations for environmental protection. Law Herald, 6, 158-165. doi: 10.32782/yuv.v6.2022.19.
[38] Mekong River: A new flashpoint in Indo-Pacific? (2021). Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/how-mekong-river-is-turning-into-a-new-flashpoint-in-indo-pacific/a-58842727.
[39] Mueller, J.T., & Gasteyer, S. (2021). The widespread and unjust drinking water and clean water crisis in The United States. Nature Communications, 12, article number 3544. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23898-z.
[40] Ogoni people struggle with Shell Oil, Nigeria, 1990-1995. (n.d.). Global Nonviolent Action Database. Retrieved from https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/ogoni-people-struggle-shell-oil-nigeria-1990-1995.
[41] Omaka, A.C. (2022). Guiding enforcement mechanisms in international environmental law. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357883997_Guiding_Enforcement_Mechanisms_In_International_Environmental_Law.
[42] Over the 11 months of the war, Russian aggression has caused environmental damage worth over 1 trillion 743 billion UAH. (2023). Retrieved from https://dei.gov.ua/post/2499.
[43] Pidhorodynska, Yu. (2023). International compliance-monitoring bodies for environmental protection treaties. (Doctoral dissertation, Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine).
[44] Planning and Environment Court. (2024). QuennsLand Courts. Retrieved from https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/courts/planning-and-environment-court.
[45] Poorhashemi, A. (2022). International law and global governance. CIFILE Journal of International Law, 3(5), 70-74. doi: 10.30489/CIFJ.2021.312236.1041.
[46] Pulp mills on the river Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay). Overview of the Case. (2010, April). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/case/135.
[47] Resolution of the General Assembly of UN No. 64/292 “The Human Right to Water and Sanitation”. (2010, July). Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/687002/files/A_RES_64_292- EN.pdf.
[48] Rich countries use six times more resources, generate 10 times the climate impacts than low- income ones. (2024). UN Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/rich-countries-use-six-times-more-resources-generate-10-times.
[49] Shao, X. (2021). Environmental and human rights counterclaims in international investment arbitration: At the crossroad of domestic and international law. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(1), 157-179. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgab001.
[50] Stephanyshyn, N. (2024). How Russiaʼs invasion is affecting Ukraineʼs environment and what we can do to recover. Retrieved from https://osvita.nakypilo.ua/yak-viyna-vplyvaye-na-dovkillya-ukrayiny/.
[51] Swedish Environmental Code. (1999, January). Retrieved from https://www.government.se/contentassets/be5e4d4ebdb4499f8d6365720ae68724/the-swedish-environmental-code-ds-200061/.
[52] Tackling the global environmental crisis through innovation and entrepreneurship. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/tackling-global-environmental-crisis-through-innovation-entrepreneurship/37018/.
[53] Timeline of U.S. sanctions. (2024). United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved from https://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/timeline-us-sanctions.
[54] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/.
[55] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1999, June). Retrieved from https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MU82K23R.
[56] Voeten, E. (2020). Populism and backlashes against international courts Perspectives on Politics, 18(2), 407-422. doi: 10.1017/S1537592719000975.
[57] Voigt, C. (2021). The first climate judgment before the Norwegian supreme court: Aligning law with politics. Journal of Environmental Law, 33(3), 697-710. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqab019.
[58] Warnock, C. (2022). Environmental courts and tribunals: Powers, integrity and the search for legitimacy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
[59] Wesche, P. (2021). Rights of nature in practice: A case study on the impacts of the Colombian Atrato river decision. Journal of Environmental Law, 33(3), 531-556. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqab021.
[60] Young, B., Ingwersen, W.W., Bergmann, M., Hernandez-Betancur, J.D., Ghosh, T., Bell, E., & Cashman, S. (2022). A system for standardizing and combining U.S. Environmental Protection Agency emissions and waste inventory data. Applied Sciences, 12(7), article number 3447. doi: 10.3390/ app12073447.
[61] Zarei, S. (2023). International legal cases enhancing the scope of environmental protection: Peer- reviewed article. Italian Review of Legal History, 9, 331-355. doi: 10.54103/2464-8914/21919.
[62] Zhen, R., Tao, H., & Liu, M. (2024). Harmonizing international environmental law and national sovereignty. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 52, 156-162. doi: 10.54254/2753-7048/52/20241565.