Law. Human. Environment

Administrative and procedural status of entities involved in proceedings concerning violations of fisheries protection legislation

Vladyslav Lavrenchuk
Download article
Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the procedural activities of authorised bodies in cases concerning violations of fisheries protection legislation. A systematic approach was used in the study to examine the institutional structure of fisheries protection authorities in relation to the National Police, courts and local executive authorities. The result was the identification of the key role of fisheries protection authorities in recording offences, as well as the determination of the need for more effective coordination of their activities with other law enforcement agencies. It was established that interaction with the National Police contributed to strengthening control over compliance with legislation, but had shortcomings in terms of the rapid exchange of information and proper documentation of violations. Court decisions were analysed, in particular rulings from 2023-2024, which illustrate practical problems of law enforcement in the field of fisheries. The analysis revealed inconsistencies in the courts’ approaches to assessing the evidence in cases of violations of fisheries legislation, which negatively affects the legal certainty of court decisions. The judicial authorities performed the function of verifying the legality of the actions of administrative bodies, but the practice of applying sanctions varied depending on the specific circumstances of the case. The use of a comparative legal method made it possible to compare Ukrainian experience with the practice of EU countries, in particular, the approach of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of “Yașar v. Romania” to the confiscation of property used for illegal fishing was analysed. This made it possible to identify common features in the application of sanctions and to justify the compliance of Ukrainian practice with European standards

Keywords

environmental challenges; aquatic biological resources; illegal fishing; violation of fishing rules; prosecution

Suggested citation
Lavrenchuk, V. (2025). Administrative and procedural status of entities involved in proceedings concerning violations of fisheries protection legislation. Law. Human. Environment, 16(4), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/4.2024.95
References
  1. Agreement on the Implementation of International Conservation and Management Measures for Fishery Resources. (1993, August). Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/4/y5357e/y5357e07.htm.
  2. Bennett, N.J. (2019). In political seas: Engaging with political ecology in the ocean and coastal environment. Coastal Management, 47(1), 67-87. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2019.1540905.
  3. Carvalho, M., Mathis, J., Hamzah, B.A., Forbes, V.Louis, Carlarne, C.P., & Manfredi, J.L. (2023). Ocean law, policies, and regulation. In Oceans and human health (pp. 643-685). London: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-95227-9.00023-3.
  4. Chen, X., Xu, Q., & Li, L. (2023). Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing governance in disputed maritime areas: Reflections on the international legal obligations of states. Fishes, 8(1), article number 36. doi: 10.3390/fishes8010036.
  5. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. (1984, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text.
  6. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://surl.lt/xqzdbt.
  7. Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text.
  8. Donlan, C.J., Wilcox, C., Luque, G.M., & Gelcich, S. (2020). Estimating illegal fishing from enforcement officers. Scientific Reports, 10(1), article number 12478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69311-5.
  9. EU Marine Strategy. (2008, June). Retrieved from https://surl.li/mypwqv.
  10. European Convention on Human Rights. (1950, November). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG.
  11. Faiyaz, T., & Al Arif, A. (2022). Towards a blue revolution in the bay of Bengal: Tackling illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing through effective regional cooperation. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 23(1), 9-38. doi: 10.1163/22119000-12340239.
  12. Fajardo, T. (2022). To criminalise or not to criminalise IUU fishing: The EU’s choice. Marine Policy, 144, article number 105212. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105212.
  13. Fedchyshyn, D.V. (2022). Practical legal problems of using aquatic biological resources in the field of fisheries. Law and Society, 2, 128-134. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736/2022.2.20.
  14. Figueroa, I. (2021). Artisanal coastal marine fishing and the cultural rights of ethnic communities in Colombia. Veredas do Direito, 18(40), 309-337. doi: 10.18623/rvd.v18i40.1953.
  15. Heidrich, K.N., Meeuwig, J.J., & Zeller, D. (2023). Reconstructing past fisheries catches for large pelagic species in the Indian Ocean. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 2296-7745. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1177872.
  16. Husein, Y., & Aziz, M.F. (2020). The necessity to reform Indonesian legal framework on provisional arrangement to combat IUU Fishing. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 18, 125-151. doi: 10.17304/ijil.vol18.1.805.
  17. Judgement of the Belyaevsky District Court of Odessa Region No. 123737886. (2024, November). Retrieved from https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/123737886/.
  18. Judgement of the Commercial Court of Odessa Region in the Case No. 916/2571/23. (2023, October). Retrieved from https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/114150706?utm.
  19. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Case No. 64863/13 “Yașar v. Romania”. (2020, February). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-198637%22]}.
  20. Kozhura, L. (2021). Peculiarities of legal regulation of the aquaculture sector in Ukraine. Legal Bulletin, 1, 132-137. doi: 10.32837/yuv.v0i1.2090.
  21. Kupinets, L.E., & Shershun, O.M. (2022). Market capacity of fishery and fish farming products based on the principles of determining the ratio of supply and demand. Eastern Europe: Economy, Business and Management, 4(37), 23-32. doi: 10.32782/easterneurope.37-4.
  22. Law of Ukraine No. 1264-XII “On Environmental Protection”. (1991, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12#Text.
  23. Law of Ukraine No. 2894-III “On the Fauna”. (2001, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2894-14#Text.
  24. Law of Ukraine No. 2989-IX “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Improving State Regulation in the Field of Fisheries, Conservation and Rational Use of Aquatic Bioresources and the Field of Aquaculture”. (2023, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2989-20#Text.
  25. Law of Ukraine No. 3677-VI “On Fisheries, Industrial Fishing and Protection of Aquatic Biological Resources”. (2011, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3677-17#Text.
  26. Law of Ukraine No. 5293-VI “On Aquaculture”. (2012, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5293-17#Text.
  27. Law of Ukraine No. 580-VIII “On the National Police”. (2015, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580-19#Text.
  28. Mackay, M., Hardesty, B.D., & Wilcox, C. (2020). The intersection between illegal fishing, crimes at sea, and social well-being. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, article number 589000. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.589000.
  29. Nakamura, J.N. (2022). Legal reflections on the small-scale fisheries guidelines: Building a global safety net for small-scale fisheries. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 37(1), 31-72. doi: 10.1163/15718085-bja10081.
  30. Nakamura, J.N. (2023). International fisheries law: Past to future. In S. Partelow, M. Hadjimichael & A.K. Hornidge (Eds.), Ocean governance. MARE publication series (pp. 175-207). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20740-2.
  31. Oral, N. (2020). Reflections on the past, present, and future of IUU fishing under international law. International Community Law Review, 22(3-4), 368-376. doi: 10.1163/18719732-12341435.
  32. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 402-р “Strategy for the Development of Fisheries until 2030”. (2023, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/402-2023-%D1%80#n10.
  33. Order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine No. 101 “On Approval of the Instructions for Registration of Materials on Administrative Offenses by fish Protection Bodies”. (2003, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0320-03#Text.
  34. Order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine No. 512 “On Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Fish Protection Raids”. (2018, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1296-18#Text.
  35. Ragulin, I.Yu. (2024). The use of aquatic bioresources as a factor in ensuring food security of Ukraine: Legal aspects. Electronic Scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Law”, 5, 423-427. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.05.66.
  36. Regulation of the European Council No. 1005/2008 “On the Establishing a System to Combat Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing”. (2008, September). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1005/oj/eng.
  37. Regulation of the European Council No. 1224/2009 “On the Establishing a Control System for Ensuring Compliance with the Rules of the Common Fisheries Policy”. (2009, November). Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC091900/.
  38. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 895 “On Approval of the Regulations on the State Agency of Ukraine for the Development of Land Reclamation, Fisheries and Food Programs”. (2015, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/895-2015-%D0%BF#Text.
  39. Ripenko, A.I., & Nastina, O.I. (2022). Problems of regulatory and legal support of fishing and fish farming in Ukraine. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 9, 191-196. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-9/46.
  40. Rosello, M. (2022). Regional fishery management organisation measures and the imposition of criminal and administrative sanctions in respect of high seas fishing. Marine Policy, 144, article number 105213. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105213.
  41. Sakhno, A.P. (2023). Regarding the content of the jurisdictional powers of the water police and the State Fisheries Agency during joint law enforcement raids. Ukrainian Policing: Theory, Legislation, Practice, 1(5), 77-81. doi: 10.32782/2709-9261-2022-1-5-14.
  42. Sakhno, A.P., & Kovalenko, Ya.A. (2023). Current issues of interaction between water police units and territorial bodies of the State Fisheries Agency during fish protection raids. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 77(2), 108-113. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.18.
  43. Song, A.M., Scholtens, J., Barclay, K., Bush, S.R., Fabinyi, M., Adhuri, D.S., & Haughton, M. (2020). Collateral damage? Small-scale fisheries in the global fight against IUU fishing. Fish and Fisheries, 21(4), 831-843. doi: 10.1111/faf.12462.
  44. Stefanus, A.A., & Vervaele, J.A. (2021). Fishy business: Regulatory and enforcement challenges of transnational organised IUU fishing crimes. Trends in Organized Crime, 24(4), 581-604. doi: 10.1007/s12117-021-09425-y.
  45. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1994, November). Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/legal/pages/unitednationsconventiononthelawofthesea.aspx.
  46. Vince, J., Hardesty, B.D., & Wilcox, C. (2021). Progress and challenges in eliminating illegal fishing. Fish and Fisheries, 22(3), 518-531. doi: 10.1111/faf.12532.