Ways to improve the regulatory and legal framework for the activities of scientific institutions in the agro-industrial complex in the field of sustainable development and environmental protection

Vyacheslav Lepekha, Serhiy Slyusarenko
Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the regulatory and legal framework for the functioning of scientific institutions and ways to improve their effectiveness in addressing key environmental issues. The following methods were used in the study: content analysis of regulatory and legal acts governing sustainable development of economic activity in Ukraine; comparative analysis of the activities of scientific institutes in Ukraine, France, Germany and Switzerland in the field of sustainable development and environmental safety; and contextual analysis of the implementation of a codified regulatory framework in the management of national research institutes in the agro-industrial segment. It was found that research in the field of sustainable development is a key prerequisite for the effective development of the agro-industrial segment. In Ukraine, the activities of research institutes in the agro-industrial complex are hampered by a fragmented regulatory and legal framework, the lack of a universal definition of sustainable development in the national legal field, the lack of incentives for conducting relevant research in the segment, and the limited adaptation of European and international standards in sustainable development management, in particular environmental protection. Based on the experience of individual European Union member states – France, Germany and Switzerland – the following recommendations have been developed: the development of a single legislative act to regulate the activities of scientific institutions in the agro-industrial complex, the integration of pan- European standards of sustainable development into the Ukrainian regulatory framework, introduction of mechanisms to stimulate research in the field of sustainable development and environmental protection, as well as the introduction of a unified system for monitoring and controlling research on sustainable development in the agro-industrial complex. The results of the work can be used to improve the effectiveness of research in the agro-industrial complex

Keywords

Triple Bottom Line model; rational use of resources; food security; economic benefits; systematisation; codification; resource management

Suggested citation
Lepekha, V., & Slyusarenko, S. (2025). Ways to improve the regulatory and legal framework for the activities of scientific institutions in the agro-industrial complex in the field of sustainable development and environmental protection. Law. Human. Environment, 16(4), 158-176. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/4.2025.158
References
  1. Abdullah, R., Najim, M.M.M., & Esham, M. (2024). Agriculture for sustainable development to empower smallholder farming communities. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19(3), 462-474. doi: 10.4038/jas.v19i3.10831.
  2. Agro Review. (2025). Switzerland supports the development of Ukraine’s organic and dairy sectors. Retrieved from https://agroreview.com/content/shvejcariya-pidtrymuye-rozvytok-orhanichnoho-ta-molochnoho-sektoriv-ukrayiny.
  3. Agrohub. (2025). Analyzing millions of numbers to help you earn millions of dollars. Retrieved from https://agrohub.ua/en/about/.
  4. Agroscope. (2025). Agroscope: Good food, healthy environment. Retrieved from https://www. agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/en/home.html.
  5. Ametepey, S.O., Aigbavboa, C., Ansah, S.K., & Gyadu-Asiedu, W. (2023). Meaning, evolution, principles, and future of sustainable development: A systematic review. Preprintsdoi: 10.20944/preprints202302.0158.v1.
  6. An, P., Wang, R., Wang, Y., & Pavel, K. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on sustainable development: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. article number 1341471. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1341471.
  7. Atapattu, A.J., Ranasinghe, C.S., Udumann, S.S., & Nuwarapaksha, T.D. (2024). Sustainable agriculture and sustainable development goals. In Emerging technologies and marketing strategies for sustainable agriculture (pp. 1-27). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-4864-2.ch001.
  8. Borko, T., & Jammal, M. (2024). Role of agriculture in the development of Ukrainian socio- economic potential. Agrarian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28(3), 78-86. doi: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/3.2024.78.
  9. Bundesamt fur Statistik. (2023). Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.aboutswitzerland.eda.admin.ch/en/economy-agriculture.
  10. Chub, A. (2021). Current state and development trends of the agro-industrial complex of UkraineAzov Economic Bulletin, 5, 34-43. doi: 10.32840/2522-4263/2021-5-5.
  11. Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 722/2019 “On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine for the Period Until 2030”. (2019, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019#Text.
  12. Economic Code of Ukraine. (2003, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15?lang=en#Text.
  13. European Climate Law. (2021, June). Retrieved from https://surl.li/yiesjg.
  14. European Environment Agency. (2025). Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in Europe. Retrieved from https://surl.li/fnrzws.
  15. European Green Deal. (2019, December). Retrieved from https://surl.li/xptoum.
  16. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture. (2025). Farming. Retrieved from https://surl.li/cubljv.
  17. FiBL Switzerland. (2025). FiBL in Frick. Retrieved from https://surl.li/vridbf.
  18. Fischer, M., Frece, J., Hillebrand, K., & Foord, D. (2023). The concept in sustainale development. In Sustainable business (pp. 17-27). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25397-3_2.
  19. Frątczak-Müller, J., Rychła, A., Winiwarter, W., & Amon, B. (2024). Social conditions of smallholder dairy farmers influence their environmental decisions. Scientific Reports, 14. article number 31020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82120-4.
  20. Gicheha, M.G., Mwashi, V., Mbindyo, P., Maina, R.A., & Mugodo, C. (2023). Role of research and innovation on sustainable development. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 22(1). doi: 10.4314/jagst.v22i1.1.
  21. Haisyn District State Administration. (2021). The establishment of the French right to manage water resources and technologies for land expansion for Vinnytsia is de facto factual. Retrieved from https://surl.li/wupmfo.
  22. Horbata, L.P. (2024). Regulatory and legal support for the sustainable development of territorial communitiesSuccesses and Achievements in Science, 9(9), 468-478. doi: 10.52058/3041-1254-2024-8(8).
  23. Hreshchuk, H.I. (2022). Normative and legal regulation of sustainable use of agricultural lands. Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine, 1(42), 26-31. doi:10.37405/1729-7206.2022.1(42).26-31.
  24. Institute for European Environmental Policy. (2024). Supporting a transition to sustainable farming systems. Retrieved from https://ieep.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Supporting-a-transition-to-sustainable-farming-systems-IEEP-2024.pdf.
  25. Institute of Agroecology and Environmental Management of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine. (2025). Retrieved from https://agroeco.org.ua/.
  26. International Association of Universities. (2025). Eberswalde university for sustainable development (HNEE). Retrieved from https://surl.li/nsykda.
  27. International Trade Administration. (2023). Germany. Agricultural sector overview. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/germany-agricultural-sector.
  28. International Trade Administration. (2024). France. Agricultural sector overview. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/france-agricultural-sector.
  29. Kindangen, J.G., Kairupan, A.N., Joseph, G.H., Bawung, J.B.M., & Indrasti, R. (2023). Sustainable agricultural development through agribusiness approach and provision of location specific technology in North Sulawesi. E3S Web of Conferences, 444, article number 01003. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344401003.
  30. Law of Ukraine No. 1602-III “On State Forecasting and Development of Programs for the Economic and Social Development of Ukraine”. (2000, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1602-14?lang=en#Text.
  31. Law of Ukraine No. 2411-VI “On the Principles of Domestic and Foreign Policy of Ukraine”. (2010, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2411-17#Text.
  32. Lelechenko, A. (2020). Evolution of regulatory framework for ensuring sustainable development of Ukraine. Investytsiyi: Praktyka ta Dosvid, 15-16, 132-137. doi: 10.32702/2306-6814.2020.15-16.132.
  33. Li, L. (2024). The impact of sustainable development strategies on corporate performance. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 7(1). doi: 10.26689/pbes.v7i1.6075.
  34. Lima, R., & Guedes, G. (2024). Sustainable development goals and gender equality: A social design approach on gender-based violence. Sustainability, 16(2), article number 914. doi: 10.3390/su16020914.
  35. Liu, S. (2023). Towards a sustainable agriculture: Achievements and challenges of sustainable development goal indicator 2.4.1. Global Food Security, article number 100694. 37. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100694.
  36. Mahfudz, A.A., & Mutaali, L. (2024). The role of agricultural sector in sustainable development: Analysis of data availability and achievement of sustainable development goals indicators for Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) – case study of Madiun Regency and Madium City. In 4th international conference in social sciences (4th ICONISS): Governance and poverty alleviation (pp. 322-333). Malang: KnE Open. doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i27.17116.
  37. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2024). Strategy for introducing sustainable development reporting by enterprises. Retrieved from https://mof.gov.ua/storage/files/UKR_Presentation_Strategy%20of%20sustainability%20reporting.pdf.
  38. National Scientific Center “O.N. Sokolovsky Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry”. (2025). Retrieved from https://issar.com.ua/.
  39. Nehrey, M., & Trofimtseva, O. (2022). Analysis of the agricultural sector of Ukraine during the war. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Economic Series, 102, 49-56. doi: 10.26565/2311-2379-2022-102-06.
  40. Nemenyi, M., Kovacs, A.J., Olah, J., Popp, J., Erdei, E., Harsanyi, E., Ambrus, B., Teschner, G., & Nyeki, A. (2022). Challenges of sustainable agricultural development with special regard to the Internet of Things: Survey. Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences, 18(1). 95-114. doi: 10.1556/446.2022.00053.
  41. Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J.M. (2023). Triple bottom line, sustainability. And economic development: What binds them together? A biometric approach. Sustainability, 15(8), article number 6706. doi: 10.3390/su15086706.
  42. Ogryzek, M. (2023). The sustainable development paradigm. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 17(1), 5-18. doi: 10.7494/geom.2023.17.1.5.
  43. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 70-2022-р “On approval of the Concept of the National Target Program for Land Use and Protection”. (2022, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/70-2022-%D1%80?lang=en#Text.
  44. Pathak, M., Patel, S., & Some, S. (2024). Climate change mitigation and sustainable development goals: Evidence and research gaps. PLOS Climate, 3(3), article number e0000366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000366.
  45. Purnama, Y.I. (2024). Implementation of the triple bottom line concept to improve sustainable marketing performance. Journal of Economics and Business Letters, 4(2), 40-50. doi: 10.55942/jebl.v4i2.284.
  46. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1015-р “Strategy for Introducing Sustainable Development Reporting by Enterprises”. (2024, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1015-2024-%D1%80#Text.
  47. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 688-р “Irrigation and Drainage Strategy in Ukraine for the Period Until 2030”. (2019, August). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/688-2019-%D1%80?lang=en#Text.
  48. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 70-р “Concept of the National Target Programme for Land Use and Protection”. (2022, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/70-2022-%D1%80#Text.
  49. Rosse, M.A., & Gonzalez, F.A.I. (2024). The impact of sustainable practices on the financial performance of companies: A review of the literature. Vision de Future, 28(1), 221-240. doi: 10.36995/j.visiondefuturo.2023.28.01.006.en.
  50. Shebanina, O., Poltorak, A., & Chorniy, D. (2024). Global food security: Challenges in achieving the sustainable development goals. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28(4), 9-20. doi: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/4.2024.09.
  51. Shvets, N., Shevtsova, H., Pidorycheva, I., Prokopenko, O., & Maslosh, O. (2023). Sustainable development of agriculture based on the smart specialization approach: Cases of the central and eastern European countries. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(1), 260-282. doi: 10.51599/are.2023.09.01.12.
  52. Skydan, O., Bugaychuk, V., Grabchuk, I., Sych, K., & Kubrak, S. (2024). Growth of value added as a factor in the development of Ukrainian agriculture in the context of accelerated integration into the EU. Scientific Horizons, 27(5), 143-158. doi: 10.48077/scihor5.2024.143.
  53. Sokolska, T., Polischuk, S., & Osypenko, B. (2024). Ukraine agricultural policy adaptation to the natural environment challenges. Public Administration Aspects, 12(1), 29-36. doi: 10.15421/152404.
  54. Tenorio, A.O., & Tenorio, M.O. (2024). Relationship between sustainable development, economy and poverty. IgMin Research, 2(7), 611-618. doi: 10.61927/igmin224.
  55. Thaher, Y., & Jaaron, A.A.M. (2022). The impact of sustainability strategic planning and management on the organizational sustainable performance: A developing-country perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 305(494), article number 1143381. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114381.
  56. Türkeş, M. (2024). The role of sustainability and sustainable development in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Sustainable Social Development, 2(1), article number 2407. doi: 10.54517/ssd.v2i1.2407.
  57. United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development “Our common future”. Retrieved from https://surl.li/svcvpx.
  58. Vyas, S., & Singh, S. (2022). Role of innovation for sustainable development in agriculture: A review. Agricultural Reviewsdoi: 10.18805/ag.R-25360.
  59. Wang, W., Wei, K., Kubatko, O., Piven, V., Chortok, Y., & Derykolenko, O. (2023). Economic growth and sustainable transition: Investigating classical and novel factors in developed countries. Sustainability, 15(16), article number 12346. doi: 10.3390/su151612346.
  60. Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences. (2025). Research at HSWT. Retrieved from https://www.hswt.de/en/research/research-profile/research-projects.
  61. Wezel, A., & David, C. (2020). Policies for agroecology in France: Implementation and impact in practice, research and education. Landbauforschung. Journal of Sustainable and Organic Agricultural Systems, 70(2), 66-76. doi: 10.3220/LBF1608660604000.