The human right to work in the context of the gig economy: International legal regulation

Sergii Shevchenko
Abstract

Significant changes in labour relations caused by the development of the digital economy have led to the emergence of new forms of employment, in particular the gig economy. However, such forms of employment create numerous problems regarding the social protection of employees and the need for international legal regulation in this area. The purpose of this study was to analyse the problems and challenges of the gig economy in the context of international legal regulation of employee protection and develop proposals for adapting existing international norms. The research methodology was based on a comparative legal analysis of international norms and regional approaches to regulating labour relations in the gig economy sector, assessing law enforcement practices in different jurisdictions, and modelling possible options for unifying legal regulation at the international level. The study showed that differences in approaches to labour laws in different countries lead to a significant legal imbalance, which makes it difficult to ensure equal rights for employees of digital platforms. It was concluded that the concept of an independent performer is widely used to apply to employees of digital platforms by the platforms themselves in order to avoid obligations arising in labour relations. Non-recognition by labour relations of the employment of employees on digital platforms creates both problems of protecting the rights of such employees, and guarantees a certain freedom of activity. Various rule-making approaches, the practice of applying current legislation and methods for determining actual labour relations were identified, in particular, through an assessment of the level of control, dependence and form of labour organisation. As a result, the need to introduce unified international norms that would cover the issues of defining modern types of employment, including issues related to such activities, was identified. These recommendations can be used to develop concepts, policies, national and international legal acts aimed at protecting labour rights in the digital era, and to ensure state economic interests related to labour activity

Keywords

the right to work; regulation of labour relations; labour migration; digital era; harmonisation of legislation; international law

Suggested citation
Shevchenko, S. (2026). The human right to work in the context of the gig economy: International legal regulation. Law. Human. Environment, 17(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/1.2026.23
References
  1. Alekseenko, I. (2024). Collective labor rights in the gig economy of Ukraine: Problems of implementation. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, 1, 150-158. doi: 10.31733/2078-3566-2023-1-150-158.
  2. Aloisi A., Rainone, S., & Countouris, N. (2023). An unfinished task? Matching the Platform Work Directive with the EU and international “social acquis”. ILO Working Paper, 101. doi: 10.54394/ZSAX6857.
  3. Atamanchuk, I., & Kovalchuk, Y. (2019). How to interpret terms “earnings” and “acuests” in the legal relations of penalty of alimonies. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 3, 134-139. doi: 10.36695/2219-5521.3.2019.21.
  4. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2025-economic-well-being-of-us-households-in-2024-employment-and-gig-work.htm?utm.
  5. California Assembly Bill No. 5. (2019, September). Retrieved from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB5.
  6. Carby-Hall, J., & Mella Méndez, L. (2020). Labour law and the gig economy: Challenges posed by the digitalisation of labour processes. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003033721
  7. Cherry, M.A. (2016). Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of workSaint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper, 2.
  8. Convention on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise No. 87. (1948, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_125#Text.
  9. Countouris, N. (2019). Defining and regulating work in the gig economy. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  10. Datta, N., Chen, R., Sunamika, S., Stinshoff, C.I., Nigatu, N., Simachew, N., Mpumelelo, N., & Klimaviciute, L. (2023). Working without borders: The promise and peril of online gig work. Washington: WorldBank Publication.
  11. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  12. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2019/1152 “On Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions in the European Union. (2019, June). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/UK/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L1152.
  13. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2024/2831 “On Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work”. (2024). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024L2831.
  14. Dubal, V. (2021). The new racial wage code. SSRNdoi: 10.2139/ssrn.3855094.
  15. European Commission. (2023). Employment and Social Developments in Europe: Addressing labour shortages and skills gaps in the EU. Retrieved from https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/employment-and-social-developments-europe-2023_en.
  16. European Commission. (2024). Annual Report on Intra-EU Labour Mobility. Retrieved from https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/annual-report-intra-eu-labour-mobility-2023_en.
  17. Eurostat. (2024). Experimental statistics on digital platform employment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240718-1.
  18. Fair Labor Standards Act of the USA. (1938, June). Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title29/html/USCODE-2011-title29-chap8.htm.
  19. Federal Act of Switzerland No. 142.20 “On Foreign Nationals and Integration Act, FNIA”. (2005, December). Retrieved from https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2007/758/en.
  20. Financier Worldwide. (2023). Legal considerations for the future of work in the era of digital transformation. Retrieved from https://www.financierworldwide.com/legal-considerations-for-the-future-of-work-in-the-era-of-digital-transformation.
  21. Government of Canada. (2025). Temporary Foreign Worker. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/temporary-foreign-worker.html.
  22. Hara, K., Adams, A., Milland, K., Savage, S., Callison-Burch, C., & Bigham, J.P. (2018). A data-driven analysis of workersʼ earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In CHI ʼ18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (article number 449). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3173574.3174023.
  23. Hsieh, J., Adisa, O., Bafna, S., & Zhu, H. (2024). Supporting gig worker needs and advancing policy through worker-centered data-sharing. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02973.
  24. Huys, A. (2024). EU acts on platform work: what protection for the self-employed? Retrieved from https://global-workplace-law-and-policy.kluwerlawonline.com/2024/06/12/embracing-sustainability-in-value-chains-through-eu-legislation-the-labour-rights-perspective/.
  25. Johnston, H. (2019). Labour geographies of the platform economy: Understanding collective organizing strategies in the context of digitally mediated work. International Labour Review, 159(1), 25-45. doi: 10.1111/ilr.12154.
  26. Judgment of the European Court in Case No. C-434/15 “Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL”. (2017, December). Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=201390&mode=req&pageIndex=1&dir=&occ=first&part=1&text=&doclang=EN&cid=2152620.
  27. Judgment of the Supreme Court of Spain No. 805/2020. (2020. September). Retrieved from https://vlex.es/vid/849700129.
  28. Judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Case No. A2/2017/3467 “Uber BV and Others (Appellants) v Aslam and Others (Respondents)”. (2021, February). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2019-0029.
  29. Khanenko, A. (2024). The interrelation between the development of artificial intelligence technologies and the global economy and labour market. Management and Business, 2(2), 52-61. doi: 10.59214/mb/2.2024.52.
  30. Labour Code of Ukraine. (1996, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1105-14#Text.
  31. Law of California “App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative”. (2020, November). Retrieved from https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2020/Prop22-110320.pdf.
  32. Law of the USA on the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act). (2021, October). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/842.
  33. Law of Ukraine No. 1105-XIV “On Compulsory State Social Insurance”. (1999, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1105-14#Text.
  34. Law of Ukraine No. 1667-IX “On Stimulating the Development of the Digital Economy in Ukraine”. (2021, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1667-IX.
  35. Lerouge, L. (2021). The right to disconnect from the workplace: A review of the French legal framework. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 37(2), 217-234. doi: 10.4324/9781003033721.
  36. Méndez, L.M., & Sánchez, A.V. (Eds.). (2020). Regulating the platform economy. international perspectives on new forms of work. London: Reoutledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003035008.
  37. National Labor Relations Act of the USA. (1935, July). Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/national-labor-relations-act.
  38. Occupational Safety and Health Act of USA (OSHA). (1970, December). Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/oshact/completeoshact.
  39. Opinion of the Supreme Court of California in Case “Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court”. (2018, April). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2018/s222732.html.
  40. Panchenko, V.G., Reznikova, N.V., Ivashchenko, O.A., & Rusak, D.M. (2024). Gig economy as an environment for the transformation of the international labor market. Investments: Practice and Experience, 4, 12-18. doi: 10/32702/2306-6814.2024.4.12.
  41. Pew Research Center. (2021). The state of gig work in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/12/08/the-state-of-gig-work-in-2021/.
  42. Protection of Wages Convention No. 95. (1949, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_146#Text.
  43. Rainone, S. (2023). Digital transition: An opportunity to advance labour rights. Retrieved from https://global-workplace-law-and-policy.kluwerlawonline.com/2022/02/01/digital-transition-an-opportunity-to-advance-labour-rights/.
  44. Risak, M. (2018). Fair working conditions for platform workers: Possible regulatory approaches at the EU level. Berlin: International Policy Analysis.
  45. Segdiepko, T., & Krainik, O. (2024). Socio-economic inequality of the population in Ukraine: Challenges and prospects for ensuring resilience. Management and Business, 2(2), 6-17. doi: 10.59214/mb/2.2024.06.
  46. Shumylo, M. (2022). Work on online platforms (Uber, Uklon, Bolt, Glovo, Raketa etc.): Labour vs. civil relations. Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/trudove-pravo/pracya-na-onlaynplatformah-uber-uklon-bolt-glovo-raketa-etc-trudovi-vs-civilni-vidnosini-.html.