Law. Human. Environment

Issue of establishing socially responsible public procurement of tactical equipment

Iurii Storozhuk
Download article
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the specific feature of legal regulation of socially oriented public procurement with a focus on tactical equipment. The study comprehensively analysed the current legislation and identified key shortcomings, specifically the lack of mechanisms for the implementation of socially responsible criteria in the public procurement process. It was found that the focus on the lowest price in tenders hinders the assurance of product quality and social labour standards. The study also covered an analysis of international practices, including European Union legislation, specifically Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement, which could be adapted in Ukraine. The study found that Ukraine faces a series of challenges related to socially responsible public procurement, particularly of tactical equipment. Procurement procedures, specifically for body armour, require substantial changes to improve efficiency and reduce corruption risks. One of the key problems is the lengthy procedures, which do not meet the needs of urgent deliveries for the military. As a result, instead of using public procurement, many unit commanders and volunteers turn to charitable organisations or private suppliers, leading to unauthorised deliveries and fraud. The study also analysed the practices of the United States and Finland in socially responsible procurement of tactical equipment. In Finland, public procurement includes environmental and social criteria for selecting suppliers, which ensures high quality standards and promotes the sustainable development of local production. Analysis of the US practices showed the significance of supporting local suppliers through programmes such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which encourages small businesses and suppliers and gives preference to domestic goods in federal procurement. The findings of the study indicated the necessity of simplifying procurement procedures. This would markedly improve the efficiency of public resource use, reduce corruption risks, and ensure the quality of tactical equipment supplies for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Keywords

military operations; personal protective equipment; bulletproof vest; tender documentation; decent working conditions

Suggested citation
Storozhuk, I. (2025). Issue of establishing socially responsible public procurement of tactical equipment. Law. Human. Environment, 16(2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/2.2025.69
References

[1] Amann, M., Roehrich, J., Eßig, M., Harland, C., Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2014). Driving sustainable supply chain management in the public sector: The importance of public procurement in the European Union. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 351-366. doi: 10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0447.

[2] Ankersmit, L. (2020). The contribution of EU public procurement law to corporate social responsibility. European Law Journal, 26, 9-26. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12353.

[3] Association Agreement Between the European Union and its Member States, of the One Part, and Ukraine, of the Other Part. (2014, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text.

[4] Bryson, J., & George, B. (2020). Strategic management in public administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.139.

[5] Caranta, R. (2022). Towards socially responsible public procurement. ERA Forum, 23, 149-164. doi: 10.1007/s12027-022-00718-5.

[6] Casady, C.B., Petersen, O.H., & Brogaard, L. (2023). Public procurement failure: The role of transaction costs and government capacity in procurement cancellations. Public Management Review. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2231945.

[7] Demircioglu, M.A., & Vivona, R. (2021). Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: An empirical study. Policy and Society, 40(3), 379-396. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2021.1955465.

[8] Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2014/24/EU “On Public Procurement and Repealing Directive 2004/18/EC”. (2014, February). Retrieved from https://is.gd/92pMJQ.

[9] Dresvyannikova, V., & Grigorieva, V.V. (2022). The role of public procurement in the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. In All-Ukrainian scientific conference “Ukrainian present – 2022: Realities of war and prospects for the restoration of the country” (pp. 148-150). Lutsk: Donetsk National Technical University.

[10] Duong, L., Phillips, W., Roehrich, J.K., & Cook, C. (2024). Realizing NetZero in social housing: Strategic public procurement and internal stakeholder engagement. Public Management Review. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2024.2352546.

[11] Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2025, January). Retrieved from https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far.

[12] Fuentes-Bargues, J.L., Bastante-Ceca, M.J., Ferrer-Gisbert, P.S., & González-Cruz, M.C. (2021). Analysis of the situation of social public procurement of works at the Valencian Region (Spain). Sustainability, 13(1), article number 175. doi: 10.3390/su13010175.

[13] Gidigah, B.K., Agyekum, K., & Baiden, B.K. (2022). Defining social value in the public procurement process for works. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(6), 2245-2267. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0848.

[14] Grandia, J., & Meehan, J. (2017). Public procurement as a policy tool: Using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 302-309. doi: 10.1108/ijpsm-03-2017-0066/full/html.

[15] Grimbert, S.F., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., & Valovirta, V. (2024). Transformative public procurement for innovation: Ordinary, dynamic and functional capabilities. Public Management Review. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2024.2326079.

[16] Hafsa, F., Darnall, N., & Bretschneider, S. (2022). Social public purchasing: Addressing a critical void in public purchasing research. Public Administration Review, 82(5), 818-834.

[17] Jain, P. K., Hazenberg, R., Seddon, F., & Denny, S. (2019). Social value as a mechanism for linking public administrators with society: Identifying the meaning, forms and process of social value creation. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 876-889. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1660992.

[18] Klein, N., Ramos, T.B., & Deutz, P. (2022). Factors and strategies for circularity implementation in the public sector: An organisational change management approach for sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 509-523.

[19] Labour Code of Ukraine. (1996, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/322-08/ed19960723#Text.

[20] Law of Ukraine No. 808-IX “On Defense Procurement”. (2020, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/808-20#Text.

[21] Law of Ukraine No. 922-VIII “On Public Procurement”. (2015, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/922-19#Text.

[22] Lonsdale, C., & le Mesurier, N. (2024). Learning to do good: Developing capabilities to deliver social value from public procurement within English public authorities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(6), 729-747. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2023-0145.

[23] Malolitneva, V. (2021). “Green” and socially responsible public procurement: Strengthening the state regulation and defining new international competition terms and conditions. Entrepreneurship, Economics and Law, 3, 99-107. doi: 10.32849/2663-5313/2021.3.16.

[24] Manta, O., Panait, M., Hysa, E., Rusu, E., & Cojocaru, M. (2022). Public procurement, a tool for achieving the goals of sustainable development. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(61), 861-876.

[25] Mebrate, Y., & Shumet, K. (2024). Assessing the impact of procurement practice on organizational performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2315687.

[26] Melander, L., & Arvidsson, A.P. (2020). Getting innovations out of interactions in the public procurement context. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(12), 2051-2065. doi: 10.1108/ JBIM-09-2019-0414.

[27] Olsson, D., & Öjehag-Pettersson, A. (2020). Buying a sustainable society: The case of public procurement in Sweden. Local Environment, 25(9), 681-696. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1820471.

[28] Petrenko, Kh. (2024). Low-quality clothing for the Armed Forces of Ukraine worth UAH 25 million: Suspicion was declared against a Kyiv entrepreneur. Retrieved from https://glavcom.ua/kyiv/news/nejakisnij-odjah-dlja-zsu-na-25-mln-hrn-kijivskomu-pidprijemtsju-oholosili- pidozru--982333.html.

[29] Police of Finland. (2022). National Police Board signs a contract on police uniforms. Retrieved from https://vm.fi/en/-/25235045/national-police-board-signs-a-contract-on-police-uniforms.

[30] Rybalskaya, A. (2022). He defrauded volunteers of UAH 100,000: A Kyiv resident sold non-existent military ammunition. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/kyiv/314070-osukav-volonteriv-na- 100-tisac-grn-kianin-prodavav-neisnuucu-vijskovu-amuniciu/.

[31] Selviaridis, K., Luzzini, D., & Mena, C. (2023). How strategic public procurement creates social value: Evidence from UK anchor institutions. Public Management Review. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2277814.

[32] Semple, A. (2017). Socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) under EU law and international agreements: The GPA, CETA and the EU-Ukraine Deep and comprehensive free trade area. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 12(3), 293-309.

[33] State Emergency Service of Ukraine. (2022). Recommendations for sheltering the population during an air raid alert. Retrieved from https://dsns.gov.ua/news/ostanni-novini/informaciya-pro-organizaciyu-ukrittya-naselennya-pid-cas-nadzvicainix-situacii-u-fondi-zaxisnix-sporud- civilnogo-zaxistu.

[34] State procurement of individual uniforms (35810000-5) (Modular body armor (Type 2, Level P, Type 5, completeness: 1-5). (2023). Retrieved from https://zakupivli.pro/gov/tenders/ua-2023- 08-29-012295-a.

[35] State Statistics Committee. (2024). Working conditions at enterprises. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.ua/uk/datasets/umovy-pratsi-na-pidpryyemstvakh.

[36] Svitlychnyi, O.P., Artemenko, O.V., & Volkova, L.O. (2023). Some features of public procurement during martial law. Analytical and Comparative Law, 1, 309-316. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.50.

[37] Tender Ministry of Defense of Ukraine No. UA-2023-09-14-014201-a. (2023). Retrieved from https://prozorro.gov.ua/tender/UA-2023-09-14-014201-a?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[38] Tender of the Executive Committee of the Mariupol City Council No. UA-2023-12-20- 024744-a. (2023). Retrieved from https://prozorro.gov.ua/tender/UA-2023-12-20-024744-a.

[39] Tender of the Shyrokivska Village Council of the Zaporizhia District of the Zaporizhia Region No. UA-2023- 08-19-000250-a. (2023). Retrieved from https://prozorro.gov.ua/tender/UA-2023-08-19-000250-a.

[40] Thales group. (2024). Defence and Security. Retrieved from https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/markets/defence-and-security.

[41] The procurement agency of the Ministry of Defense has attracted 28 new Ukrainian manufacturers to supply tangible property to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. (2023). Retrieved from https://mod.gov.ua/news/28-virobnikiv-zakupivelna-agencziya-minoboroni-zaluchila-do-postachannya- rechovogo-majna-dlya-zsu.

[42] Torres-Pruñonosa, J., Plaza-Navas, M.A., Díez-Martín, F., & Beltran-Cangrós, A. (2021). The intellectual structure of social and sustainable public procurement research: A co-citation analysis. Sustainability, 13(2), article number 774. doi: 10.3390/su13020774.

[43] Troje, D., & Andersson, T. (2021). As above, not so below: Developing social procurement practices on strategic and operative levels. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(3), 242-258. doi: 10.1108/edi-03-2020-0054/full/html.

[44] Uyarra, E., Ribeiro, B., & Dale-Clough, L. (2019). Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: Responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2359-2375. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1609425.

[45] Vluggen, R., Kuijpers, R., Semeijn, J., & Gelderman, C.J. (2020). Social return on investment in the public sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(3), 235-264. doi: 10.1108/JOPP-06-2018-0023.

[46] Williams, O., & Andrew, T.E. (2021). Transparency and public procurement practices in the Nigerian Civil Service. African Journal of Business Management, 15(1), 41-48. doi: 10.5897/AJBM2020.9087.

[47] Wontner, K.L., Walker, H., Harris, I., & Lynch, J. (2020). Maximising “community benefits” in public procurement: Tensions and trade-offs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(12), 1909-1939. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-05-2019-0395.